Firstly, I will discuss the bowling situation in the test team. There is more consistency in the test team that the ODI team, mainly due to England's rise in test cricket. They found some consistency under the with the blowing attack of Anderson, Broad, Tremlett, Swann and Bresnan (they did not play all five bowlers at once, Bresnan and Tremlett were rotated). This attack was the main reason as to why England seared to that #1 ranking, just two and a half years since they were 51 all out in Jamaica. However, 2012 proved to be a tough year for the bowlers, with a bit of chop and change going on. The fact that England were playing Pakistan, in UAE, Sri Lanka and India away, meant that Panesar would get a run in the side and his great bowling, especially in India, earned him a call up to the squad to face New Zealand in March.

![]() |
Broad needs to re-think his bowling |
![]() |
Times are tough for Tim Bresnan |

![]() |
The forgotten man? |
Another bowler learning the game of test cricket is Graham Onions. A major back injury has kept him out the side from time to time, but he is also the least experienced out of all the bowlers. He played his last test against West Indies in May 2012 and hasn't bowled a ball for England since.
My verdict on which bowlers should play in the test team is quite common to other fans. As I said earlier, Anderson is a must, first name on the team sheet. This then leaves three spots open. Ideally, England play with three pace bowlers and a spinner. It can be two spinners when playing in Asia, which is totally understandable. The spinner is going to be Graeme Swann. His classy off-spin is amongst the best in the world. The second opening bowler I would choose would be Stuart Broad. Even though Broad is going through a bad patch of form, he is still a great bowler. Broad's ability is clearly shown against India in 2011 and Pakistan in 2012 and I think England should stick with him. Broad is also only 26 years old, so he has at least five more years left in him. The final seamer would be Steven Finn. Finn's raw pace is the main reason why I've selected him. The other England bowlers, particularly Anderson, lack a bit of pace, which is one of the reasons Steyn is superior to Anderson, and Finn will provide that pace. He is also quite tall and will get a lot of bounce whilst bowling. The main issue is that the seamers, except Anderson, cannot manage to stay fit consistently. They need to take a leaf out of Anderson's book when it comes to fitness.
![]() |
Injuries are too common for England's pace attack |
Jade Dernbach had a decent start to international cricket. He made his debut against Sri Lanka in 2011, bowled well and earned a chance to play against India later that year. He was an ODI regular for that summer. However, whilst his variations were like no other English bowler, his economy was always quite high and would normally be the talking point about his bowling. He had less chances in 2012 in ODI cricket, but still played the majority of T20 cricket. He took part in the World T20 in Sri Lanka, failing to impress. Dernbach played 4 matches and his economy was above 9 in all matches except against Afghanistan. This lead to more bad bowling as he was dispatched in India. His economy against India in the T20 matches was above 9 and in the 4 ODI matches he played, it was above 6. This lead to Dernbach becoming the most expensive bowler in the history of ODI cricket who has bowled 1000+ balls. There can be some sympathy with Dernbach as he does bowl at the death and during the powerplay, but I do not think it is good enough. He was not named in the ODI squad to face New Zealand later this month but, I would not dismiss Dernbach from the international arena.
![]() |
Dernbach has the most expensive economy rate in ODI cricket |
Stuart Meaker, again a bowler who has only had a handful of chances, has not really lit up the international stage, but potential is definitely there. His raw pace is the reason why ECB selectors stick with him.
On the contrast, James Tredwell continues to impress. He had a fabulous series against India this past January. He picked up 11 wickets and is possibly giving Swann a run for his money in the ODI arena. Tredwell has been in the eyes of the ECB since before the world cup in 2011, but is no doubt hitting his stride at the moment.
In limited over matches, I believe you need experience when it comes to bowling, particularly at the death and during powerplay overs. A game can be changed in these periods and it is vital that the bowlers get their lines right. I think Broad is good at death bowling and he would be alongside Anderson, Swann and Finn in the ODI team. The last bowler to choose is a tricky decision. Do you go with a seamer or spinner, or does it depend on conditions? I would pick James Tredwell alongside the other four bowlers as he is consistent and reliable. However, this does not rule out opportunities for Bresnan or Dernbach. Personally, I think Dernbach needs a rest and needs to get his game back. I think Bresnan is a very useful bowler, but at the moment Tredwell is bowling better than him. Bresnan is a player that England should certainly not drop, but his a regular in the ODI side is debatable.
In T20 cricket, I would select Broad, Finn, Swann, Tredwell and replace Anderson with Bresnan. I don't think Anderson is good enough for T20 cricket and would rather go with Bresnan.
If you have any thoughts on the bowling situation, please feel free express them to me.
Agree on Anderson - he has truly been a revelation over the last couple of years. Now swinging the ball both ways and not expensive when wickets aren't falling. I'm still not convinced with Broad taking the new ball. I would prefer to see Tremlett/Onions/Finn in that role instead. I have a sneaking suspicion that Broad may be better suited as third seamer. The problem with taking the new ball and bowling a load of rubbish is that it can set the tone for the match, if not the series.
ReplyDeleteYeah, I think Finn could be effective with the new ball, but he is slightly inexperienced. I think he would have less control. I dont think Onions is good enough to pay consistently yet and Tremlett needs to get fit again!
Delete